Skip to main content
jacob davis • co (home)

Work

Outcomes, role by role.

The numbers behind the career, most recent first, followed by a few pieces of analytical work that show how I approach a problem.

Outcomes

  1. Inmar Intelligence

    VP Healthcare Intelligence, Data Products & Decision Sciences

    2026–Present

    • Building a national healthcare intelligence platform that unifies pharmacy claims, recalls, returns, EDI, and revenue cycle data.
    • Turning that platform into licensable data products and embedded intelligence applications.
  2. Inmar Intelligence

    VP Analytics and Data Science, Media, Incentives & Loyalty

    2023–2025

    • Consolidated 50+ people into one organization and removed 700 hours a week of duplicate work with 10 fewer FTEs.
    • 5x faster time to market and $5M in incremental EBITDA in year one.
    • Launched the SaaS Analytics Portal (incrementality, marketing mix, ROAS decomposition), scaled to thousands of tenants.
    • Sustained 10% year-over-year revenue growth.
  3. Aki Technologies

    VP Marketing Intelligence

    2020–2023

    • Helped grow the business from $80M to more than $100M, with $15M tied directly to better sales planning.
    • Win rates up 23% and average deal size up 25% after moving planning from intuition to KPIs.
    • Client retention up 19%, with about 500 hours of manual work removed each year.
  4. Cheetah Digital

    Senior Director, Analytics Services

    2017–2020

    • Built a CRM analytics practice from zero, with revenue, team, and offerings growing 50%+ year over year.
    • $1M+ in average annual incremental revenue.
    • $50M+ in measurable client outcomes from applied modeling.
  5. Experian Marketing Services

    Associate Director, Strategic Services

    2013–2017

    • $30M in incremental North American revenue over two years.
    • Returned the group to growth after three years of decline.

The story behind each role is on the About page.

Selected analytical work

Client work, anonymized. Sectors are real; names, dates, and identifying details are withheld.

Which signals actually predict a sale

A lead scoring model asked which prospect behaviors carried real weight. Repeated hand-raises and event attendance mattered most. Email sends and clicks barely registered, which changed where the sales team spent its time.

Bar chart of lead scoring model coefficients: cumulative hand-raises 3.1, event attendance 2.9, hand-raised 1.4, form submissions 0.8, email clicks 0.05, email sends 0.05.
Illustrative coefficients, approximated for display. Not raw model output.

Home furnishings retail

The rarest first purchase was the most valuable one

23xMedian spend of customers buying across all five product categories, versus single-category buyers.

Five years of transactions showed that category breadth, not order count, drove customer value. Fewer than 2% of customers started with a dining table, yet those who did had a 64% chance of buying again and 55% higher five-year value than the most common entry point.

1 category · 51% of customers$307
2 categories · 31%$1,146
3 categories · 15%$2,369
4 categories · 3%$4,338
5 categories · 0.3%$7,385
Median spend by number of categories purchased.

Discount retail

Proving a digital circular sold more than it cost

$5.52Incremental revenue per media dollar, measured against a matched unexposed control.

A matched-control study on card-transaction data showed the mobile circular pulled in new buyers and took share from rival chains. It also showed the frequency cap was holding it back: households that saw it more often had 13% higher lift.

Media budget$800K
Incremental revenue$4.4M
Buyer penetration
+3.9%
New-buyer penetration
+25%
Share of wallet
+2.1%
Lift versus matched control over a nine-week program.

Specialty apparel retail

When a new brand quietly costs the old one

−30%Flagship email revenue versus its expected trend after an outlet sister brand launched.

There was no holdout, so matched comparison programs and a Bayesian structural time series model built the counterfactual. Opens held steady while clicks and revenue fell, which ruled out creative and deliverability. Demand was moving to the sister brand, roughly $28M over the period.

Unique open rate+1%
Click-through rate−10%
Daily sessions−12%
Daily revenue−30%
−60%−30%0
Effect versus expected trend. Dots are estimates; bars are 95% intervals.

Advisory

I take on a small number of advisory engagements each year. If that's what you're looking for, email me.